Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:21:32 +0100
From:      Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk>
To:        cem@freebsd.org
Cc:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>,  FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Heads up
Message-ID:  <CADWvR2gK1fmDi8NsNEi_WtushpVsUtO0zwyfoA5xtc763%2BBdtw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpXKZJFi7f=uxoXbc-MoHwd6JqZMwh-6m%2BGZvJ9JT95ZOA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CANCZdfpnYnVrvhNagYUT9RhAuC1AMCrxh=GCt8RKT0bqxuJybw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH7qZftspY=i5MaQ6sNg5L5XXBN7gfCuAMO-NZt=7Qp5zo6u_w@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6CVpXKZJFi7f=uxoXbc-MoHwd6JqZMwh-6m%2BGZvJ9JT95ZOA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 April 2016 at 17:22, Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> wrote:

If you implement a new IO scheduler you can name it whatever you like.
> "NG" isn't any more meaningful than "Netflix."
>


True, but _NETFLIX as a suffix is bad for three reasons:

1st- it creates a precedent for every sponsoring co. to want their name in
the kernel space.
2nd- I doubt any other company would want to sponsor improvement of
_NETFLIX codebase, and at the same time after how many commits does the
code become so remote from _NETFLIX code so as to have _NETFLIX become a
meaningless piece of nostalgia?
Finally, taking a leaf out of McConnell's Code Complete- variables need to
have an unambiguous and meaningful name- what on earth does _NETFLIX mean:
"to be only used at netflix", "to be used on netflix hardware", "to be used
with netflix's permission", or something else- if you need to look it up,
the variable is named wrongly!


My 2c.

Cheers,

-- 
Igor M.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADWvR2gK1fmDi8NsNEi_WtushpVsUtO0zwyfoA5xtc763%2BBdtw>