Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:06:12 +0000 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-stable-8@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r214984 - stable/8/lib/libproc Message-ID: <C8E452B9-2AAD-4F18-9176-EDD9BCC2CAB5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <ygek4knoou0.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <201011081331.oA8DViNq033723@svn.freebsd.org> <ygek4knoou0.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 8, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, >=20 >>>>>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:44 +0000 (UTC) >>>>>> Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> said: >=20 > rpaulo> Author: rpaulo > rpaulo> Date: Mon Nov 8 13:31:44 2010 > rpaulo> New Revision: 214984 > rpaulo> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/214984 >=20 > rpaulo> Log: > rpaulo> Don't use basename_r(). >=20 > rpaulo> Modified: > rpaulo> stable/8/lib/libproc/proc_sym.c >=20 > Shouldn't MFCing basename_r() be better rather than stopping use of > it? It's on my plans, but basename_r is not POSIX and there was a private = discussion about it a couple of weeks ago. The conclusion is that we = should adopt the Android semantics of basename_r(). Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C8E452B9-2AAD-4F18-9176-EDD9BCC2CAB5>