Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:32:04 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
To:        "Giovanni P. Tirloni" <tirloni@techie.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Securelevel idea 
Message-ID:  <200101212132.f0LLW4901889@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jan 2001 17:52:29 -0200." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk> 
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101211743380.564-100000@mink01.tirloni.co.uk> "Giovanni P. Tirloni" writes:
:  I was thinking about securelevels this afternoon and my brain came up
:  with an idea: what about if we could set fine-grained securelevels? Like,
:  each securelevel could have its own set of prohibitons and that could
:  only be changed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new
:  one.

Better to do this with sysctls.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101212132.f0LLW4901889>