Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 17:47:04 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@lambert.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anoncvs server Message-ID: <199702260047.RAA27200@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199702260031.RAA25951@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Feb 25, 97 05:31:00 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You might even be able to create the 'magic' branch tag on your local > machine, but I've not done it. > > Have you messed with it at all? Yes, but it looks like I can oly do one "magic" at a time without a mirror repository and writing in an incremental checkin for a vendor branch (possible with a "cvs log | sed ...", but takes too much local space to do). I posted what I posted because I got tired of the "alls ya gotta do" type answers which are really non-answers because "alls ya gotta do" doesn't work like the poster expects. In general, this area isn't well researched, unfortunately, since I'm one of the few who needs it. > ps. Whatever happened to you uploading a complete /sys tree to some site > for Julian/PHK to look at? I regenerated patches against -current, as a small portion of the changes I want including only the layering issues for namei and the simplification of the EEXISTS code duplication in 5 failure cases. Julian has these patches, and he's examined them in dteal. I don't know if he's given them to John yet or not; he said he was going to. I answered about 15 questions clarifying the nature of the patches for him, since some of the changes seemed counter-intuitive without knowing who was responsible for what. Julian seemed satisfied with the answers. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702260047.RAA27200>