Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:19:50 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Whats is this? FBSD 4.1 isn't stable! Message-ID: <20000920141950.O9141@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009202302550.469-100000@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>; from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:08:03PM %2B0200 References: <20000920135345.M9141@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009202302550.469-100000@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* O. Hartmann <ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de> [000920 14:05] wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Well, sorry, but this is not that kind of doing science by laying hands onto something > and say: well - its this kind of symptome! > > We develop here equipment for airborne measurement facilities for meteorological > science and the way we stress things makes me sure, over the time, that a system, > which has been stressed much more under much more bad conditions do not fail > in a phase of been not stressed that hard. > > Maybe you're right and I caught some kind of "hardware failure", but surely not > that kind of failure that we expect due to "overheating" the CPUs. The machine here > in front of me is much better air conditioned thatn other systems I stressed. please read this: http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ Try not to talk to me like I don't know what I'm talking about. And don't forget about the email formatting. :) thanks, -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000920141950.O9141>