Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 22:47:52 -0700 (PDT) From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: bde@freebsd.org Subject: BOOTP_NFSV3 Message-ID: <20030601054752.80675.qmail@web13505.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have a suggestion to deprecate the BOOTP_NFSV3 option, and I wanted to get some feedback. If NFS_ROOT and BOOTP_NFSV3 are defined, then it is a noop in sys/i386/i386/locore.s? If NFS_ROOT is defined and BOOTP_NFSV3 is undefined then it copies in a nfs_diskless structure in sys/i386/i386/locore.s? Is this still needed? If BOOTP_NFSV3 is defined in sys/nfsclient/bootp_subr.c, then it will attempt a nfsv3 mount and then fall back to a nfsv2 mount. Should that eventually be the default behavior? Regards, David Yeske __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030601054752.80675.qmail>