Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 21:52:06 +0100 From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: compiler info in kernel identification string Message-ID: <20121223205206.GA23190@dft-labs.eu> In-Reply-To: <50D70496.6030307@FreeBSD.org> References: <20121113234303.GA15319@dft-labs.eu> <50A5540D.2030707@FreeBSD.org> <50D70496.6030307@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 03:18:14PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 15/11/2012 22:43 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > on 14/11/2012 01:43 Mateusz Guzik said the following: > >> Hello, > >> > >> avg@ suggested to include compiler version in the kernel so that it's > >> present in uname (and one can easly tell what was used to compile it). > >> > >> Here is my attempt: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/newvers-compiler.diff > > > > When are you committing this? > > It seems that this effort has stuck?.. > > Here is a change that I am using locally. It doesn't change uname output at > all, but rather adds a compiler version string to the kernel banner. > I had other patch in this thread that did exactly that + added sysctl kern.compiler: http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/compiler-info.diff > I may even commit this :) > So, if that matters, I have no objections to your patch. However I'd like to see kern.compiler-like sysctl added. Also if you like feel free to take my patch and improve it (your compiler detection seems to be more robust). -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121223205206.GA23190>