Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:07:35 +0100 From: Mark Ovens <mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> Cc: Tobias Roth <roth@iamexwi.unibe.ch>, Pieter Westland <pieterw@euronet.nl>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: 3.x -> 4.0-STABLE upgrade instructions Message-ID: <20000329210735.F237@parish> In-Reply-To: <20000329092011.B24680@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>; from ru@ucb.crimea.ua on Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:20:11AM %2B0300 References: <20000328213052.B234@parish> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10003282318010.27642-100000@giger> <20000328223140.C234@parish> <20000329092011.B24680@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 09:20:11AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 10:31:40PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 11:21:46PM +0200, Tobias Roth wrote: > > > > > > > > > This message appeared 166 times during ``make buildworld'': > > > > > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > > > > > > It also caused config(8) on the new kernel to fail, but > > > > > > ldconfig -R /usr/obj/usr/src/lib/libc > > > > > > cured that. > > > > > > > > It goes away once you've done ``make installworld'' libc.so.3 was in > > > > 3.x but 4.x uses libc.so.4 and while you're doing ``make buildworld'' > > > > and building a new kernel you've got a sort of hybrid system. I maybe > > > > wrong here, but ISTR recall that the new compiler (2.95) gets built > > > > with the old compiler and then immediately re-builds itself using > > > > itself :-/ > > > > > > So, does that mean I can skip the ldconfig, just do make buildworld and > > > make installworld as I always did and everything will work? > > > Or do I *HAVE* to to the ldconfig? > > > > > > > Well no, when you build the 4.x kernel for the first time (before > > installworld) it needs the ldconfig in order to find libc.so.4 or the > > config will fail. Having said that, ISTR that something is being > > changed to remove the need to run ldconfig. > > > This is not the case when you build the kernel with buildkernel target. Ah yes, that was the "something" I was thinking of. Thanks. > > > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the > ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Seminars, n.: From "semi" and "arse", hence, any half-assed discussion. ________________________________________________________________ FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/ mailto:mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000329210735.F237>