Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 17:20:23 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> Cc: pst@shockwave.com (Paul Traina), asami@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cern_linemode - Imported sources Message-ID: <4767.798164423@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Apr 95 10:28:43 PDT." <199504171728.KAA28813@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Either that or indicative of the fact that the porter simply has too much time on their hands. Truly, by that yardstick you could justify *anything*! I think Paul's right - some degree of quality control must be instituted before we wind up with potentially hundreds of mutant and broken ports which make the entire collection smell like a leper colony on a hot day. In any case, this isn't our call. It's Satoshi's. He's the portsmeister and the guy who ends up CLEANING UP the messes the rest of the porters leave behind, so if he says "no" to something then it means "NO". Jordan > > Actually, your statement is in conflict with what the guidelines (used to?) > > say. > > The fact that somebody wants to port it is significant statement of utility > to me. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. > 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' > => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4767.798164423>