Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:37:36 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        jason andrade <jason@rtfmconsult.com>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: freebsd 4.9 alpha ports link points into i386 tree ?
Message-ID:  <20040122023736.GA47498@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221231130.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221124120.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20040122014706.GA46878@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221231130.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:33:02PM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>=20
> > The ports tree is the same for all architectures..there's no point in
> > duplicating it.
>=20
> ah, in that case it has been duplicated in every architecture and every
> separate release tree.
>=20
> so should the actual behaviour on disk be:
>=20
> o ports directory in releases/i386/X.X-RELEASE/
> o symlink from releases/$arch/X.X-RELEASE/ports to point back into the
>   i386 ports directory of the same release ?

Isn't that what you described?

Kris

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFADzdwWry0BWjoQKURAovPAJ9rgekHVqo0T/UdCRVVNpd/w3OLwACfQKVE
+Fh+AaAvD4usX380DhjGU7o=
=qn9J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040122023736.GA47498>