Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:06:08 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: xaphod@freebsd.co.uk Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? (View from the trenches) Message-ID: <xzp3caq92lr.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <E1AeGsK-0002qQ-4M@a1.mx.netnorth.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
xaphod@freebsd.co.uk writes: > A lot of my current fears stem from the current state of 5. I run 5.1 > on my desktop, laptop and servers. I know 5 is not rated for server > use, but I evaluate each RELEASE on a case by case basis. In testing > 5.0 I discovered it has issues, so I didn't use it. Whereas 5.1 was > perfectly stable. So I started using it. Looking at 5.2, without > testing it on any of my boxes as yet, my perception is that it's a bit > flaky. On the contrary, 5.2 is (in my experience) far more stable than 5.1, and a lot of work has gone into ACPI support and interrupt routing to make 5.2 run better on laptops and high-end servers. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3caq92lr.fsf>