Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 04:53:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230414] security/py-certifi: add option to use certificate bundle from ca_root_nss Message-ID: <bug-230414-21822-YJxS7EWP5a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230414-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230414-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230414 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openjdk.java.n | |et/browse/JDK-8224891 Status|Closed |Open Resolution|Works As Intended |--- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #7) Thanks for the detailed feedback Michael FreeBSD UX and user-choice are important principles, and with that in mind = I'm happy to reconsider the proposed option addition to the certifi port, modulo reiterating that it's also really (as) important to have things sorted out = as much as possible, and deviating behaviour as little as possible from, upstr= eam On the Python front, yep, Christian has been in touch and expressed his des= ire for the Python ports to use (at least as an option, and (on) by default), s= ome root certificate bundle. I'm keeping an eye on the upstream conversation an= d am considering what we might be able to do downstream in the meantime as that conversation moves forward --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230414-21822-YJxS7EWP5a>