Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 02:59:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: ray.kohler@mail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: compiling kernel with -fomit-frame-pointer Message-ID: <20010729025937.A85101@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010728192631.5b06c277.rkohler1@cox.rr.com>; from rkohler1@cox.rr.com on Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:26:31PM -0400 References: <20010728192631.5b06c277.rkohler1@cox.rr.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:26:31PM -0400, Ray Kohler wrote: > This is probably a really lousy idea anyway, but I'd like to know if > a kernel build with -fomit-frame-pointer will work ok. I know the > implications of using this in userland code (and of course I could > just try it and see, but I don't really want to take the time to > make a wonky kernel). Anybody know whether this is legal? Why bother? You'll start running into stability problems with the code generated by gcc if you compile with funky options. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7Y96JWry0BWjoQKURAm1eAKClpZJgM0xz0iVPNESQvzbZqff5mACg+5ni 1djanD9d7WoRGQJ3IDKNqDo= =mFVk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010729025937.A85101>