Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:50:01 -0500
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        chrisa@uvic.ca
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: problems with hal in freebsd 7.2 i386
Message-ID:  <6201873e0909301250h2c7bd96es1666a89262d3ab5b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <340fe87c23ba55b89024231e59dad7f1.squirrel@wm3.uvic.ca>
References:  <1b3000aab88ea400a8a60a56aea835c5.squirrel@wm3.uvic.ca> <20090930073601.GA824@sandcat> <6900371da03b4f476e7ff154adb9e12a.squirrel@wm3.uvic.ca> <6201873e0909301220u3cfea5a2n59a576ca6d9d1009@mail.gmail.com> <340fe87c23ba55b89024231e59dad7f1.squirrel@wm3.uvic.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:43 PM, <chrisa@uvic.ca> wrote:

> > My systems work well with hal. I find overall setup to be faster and
> > smoother(at this point in time) with hal enabled although there is much
> > adversity to it on this list.
> >
> > Do you have xf86-input-mouse installed?
>
> I do have it installed. I'm going to try manual configuration to see if I
> can make it work.
>
> By the way, you find it faster and smoother with hal enabled?


Yup

I recall
> reading an earlier thread about hal where some people found everything
> slower and less responsive. Interesting.
>

I think this was due to couple of different factors with a large one being a
one point there was a bug causing extreme cpu usage.  IMO, there was also
been a lot of misinformation and probably misconfiguration due to it.

As stated already, posting /var/log/Xorg.0.log is the best way to solve
this.



-- 
Adam Vande More



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6201873e0909301250h2c7bd96es1666a89262d3ab5b>