Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 01:49:58 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Realloc fix for review Message-ID: <v04011700b202ba674ade@[128.113.24.147]> In-Reply-To: <199808210309.VAA26640@harmony.village.org> References: Your message of "Fri, 21 Aug 1998 02:07:35 BST." <199808210107.CAA13727@awfulhak.org> <199808210107.CAA13727@awfulhak.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:08 PM -0600 8/20/98, Warner Losh wrote:
> But, the frealloc, as I implemented it (rather than how I posted it)
> looks exactly like:
If you're prepared for a particularly dumb request, how about calling
it reallocf or reallocnf ("and free") instead of frealloc? I keep
thinking "free alloc" instead of "f-realloc" when I read it. Besides,
it'd be nice if realloc and this new routine were alphabetically close
together...
---
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or drosih@rpi.edu
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v04011700b202ba674ade>