Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 09:32:26 -0600 From: ryan beasley <ryanb@goddamnbastard.org> To: Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current/stable remote gdb interoperability Message-ID: <20030103153226.GR311@goddamnbastard.org> In-Reply-To: <20030103101903.134cd49e.ak03@gte.com> References: <20030103151344.GA50346@goddamnbastard.org> <20030103101903.134cd49e.ak03@gte.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 10:19:03AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> I've seen similar erratic behaviour myself when using gdb without -k
> command switch. Can it be your problem too?
Are you saying that you don't see this problem when using the -k flag?
I don't have the -k option at my disposal. I could be wrong, but I
think that the -k extension to GDB is found only in changes made to
whatever's included under src/contrib/gdb, not in the patches for the
ports. (RELENG_4 is still including GDB 4.18, and that can't read the
debugging info in the new 5.0 kernel. That's why I installed a new
version manually. :).)
> Also, you might want to look for sample .gdbinit files for useful gbd
> macros other people are using. These files are in the tree somewhere.
Will do.
Thanks for the reply.
--
ryan beasley <ryanb@goddamnbastard.org>
GPG ID: 0x16EFBD48 http://www.goddamnbastard.org
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+Fa0KskfdOxbvvUgRAoeOAJ43snMJDudTXkngd/NQxsRq6+l+QACffo+N
5DzDVXK3Y5pnLJx6Xq7k0Mo=
=HQ6g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030103153226.GR311>