Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 17:03:53 -0500 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=C3=A9?= <olivier@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: August 2025 stabilization week Message-ID: <dbec632a-26d0-4d01-a6dd-0e0e4819d671@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5D8A52A1-4F88-4806-A7A1-988F1EF2C5AC@cschubert.com> References: <202508290546.57T5kmm4004504@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAJ-VmomiSkN_hbo9_e9XQb_0Yz7=HyY_x8A_DiohyH0%2BrLki8Q@mail.gmail.com> <202508301941.57UJfQBv003111@critter.freebsd.dk> <5D8A52A1-4F88-4806-A7A1-988F1EF2C5AC@cschubert.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 8/30/25 15:16, Cy Schubert wrote: > I'm on my phone, I don't have access to the commit hash. The patch(1} commit broke make patch for some ports. You can verify this in devel/qt5-assistance. > This seems like an odd sub-thread to drop this in, was it supposed to be in response to the general stabweek e-mail or is there some other context that might be helpful? Looking at devel/qt5-assistance, *sigh*. Our fuzz implementation is too naive and needs to learn that it can do different before/after fuzzing, I guess. Reverted in fb37e38fbe99039a, sorry about that. I'll request an exp-run when I revisit it later. Thanks, Kyle Evanshelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dbec632a-26d0-4d01-a6dd-0e0e4819d671>