Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:55:52 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x Message-ID: <fphbcf$f3l$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20080214151614.7fa0c091.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> References: <20080214114759.R75215@mail.rsts.org> <20080214151614.7fa0c091.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Brett Bump <bbump@rsts.org>: >> I'm seeing signal 6's on apache and imapd (never happened before) >> network errors, serious response time errors and generally poor >> performance during peak activity (same box, same people). > > IIRC, signal 6 is an indicator that you've compiled binaries that are > almost, but not quite compatible with your CPU. You probably mean signals 4 (SIGILL) or 10 (SIGBUS), rather than 6 (SIGABRT) :) I was getting a lot of SIGABRTs once, but that turned out to be due to PHP module order bogosity and linking mismatched threaded libraries into apache. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHvDFoldnAQVacBcgRAgPYAKDc7dE1BJZi3gU6YioTWeWqUVWiOwCgnJYC 42LqA7zNIU8dS3/5uz4yKRA= =Ydq2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fphbcf$f3l$1>