Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 20:38:23 +0200 From: Andreas Rudisch <cyb.@gmx.net> To: "Joachim Rosenfeld" <joerosenfeld@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync'able ports tree instead of csup? Message-ID: <20080513203823.e24aa7e3.cyb.@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <6e5cf6a70805131027i3f7286d0jadacbab8f862b101@mail.gmail.com> References: <6e5cf6a70805131027i3f7286d0jadacbab8f862b101@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:27:05 -0400 "Joachim Rosenfeld" <joerosenfeld@gmail.com> wrote: > IMO, something like rsync would be *way* faster for this task. Take a look at portsnap. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/portsnap.html Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/ Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkgp4CIACgkQ8P3NNypXNWXcdwCfZw+uWSKEgOqeuq0S1YqBzcNN Nn8AoLn0RyoQDZwEud2crbgk51LKXRaU =oM2E -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080513203823.e24aa7e3.cyb.>