Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:19:11 +0100 From: Josef El-Rayes <josef@daemon.li> To: "Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona@theatre.msu.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li> In-Reply-To: <400428DC.2060108@theatre.msu.edu> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <400409F4.3090205@freebsd.org> <400428DC.2060108@theatre.msu.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] "Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona@theatre.msu.edu> wrote: > 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and > therefore dropped immediatally. this sort of report is handled > wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate > what he has done why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area should be covered here too. -josef [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iQEVAwUBQAQ2n1nFItmnnbU8AQJFvwf/U6cJzOysX+GTmIViDppevmu4+J/7dBph QaUwge7PAoBTUYALp2U0zCxQEqHj2dBVCO3+VU9RLUmZoz6v2Wr8ZAdCMMgHoniz OkuXXbTUGEWbg+IW5V5os5MI2hn9+GR3wwEuo22La/qxuKNiqaC0LD033BI9pYcC 4/P753g0QXOmwC06DQ5znAYbZZHmeWAbXWNzPKRVKfwNyMUIFqNQ5KprFMhr1RIm fkwewcoOV+hGtCCWylape1cjUKw9XNicXNzGC4hYpBmJu3eC9xc2OWbnXekD4IsV 24VixhxQSnw9szzRVysYpEx37ks24pzXA9IKluQ77IWe291Ur4a9/g== =H2TM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040113181911.GB432>