Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:41:58 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can TCP changes be put in RELENG_4? Message-ID: <200112061441.fB6Efw650278@prism.flugsvamp.com> In-Reply-To: <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/3C0F0D02.8AEA9E48@mindspring.com> References: <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/20011205085750.I28101-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/200112052142.fB5LgVM53167@apollo.backplane.com> <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/3C0EF953.54CF24DB@mindspring.com> <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/3C0F0803.7010506@viasoft.com.cn>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <local.mail.freebsd-hackers/3C0F0D02.8AEA9E48@mindspring.com> you write: >Really, it boils down to the allocation systems needing rewrite, >and (painful as this is to say) a move away from type stable >memory, to permit reuse, rather than static purposing of large >blocks: static purposing is the primary reason a general turning >can not be near optimal for a lot of applications. Okay, this I can agree with. But I don't have the time or inclination to write a new memory allocator. Did you have something in mind? -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112061441.fB6Efw650278>