Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:47:12 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/ekiga pkg-plist Message-ID: <1201027632.54891.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <200801220929.29201.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200801201628.m0KGSlq6037319@repoman.freebsd.org> <200801212057.33990@aldan> <20080122022122.GA37321@k7.mavetju> <200801220929.29201.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 09:29 -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > понеділок 21 січень 2008 09:21 по, Edwin Groothuis Ви написали: > > > The new package NEVER built because of the problem, that was just fixed. > > > > It's more to differentiate between working and non-working versions. > > They are both working versions. If you need to make a distinction, you can > look at the $FreeBSD$-string. > > Bumping up the PORTREVISION would trigger an utterly useless rebuild on > thousands (millions?) of end-user computers and should not be performed > lightly. It would trigger a rebuild which would provide a correct pkg-plist. For this reason alone, policy mandates any plist change requires a PORTREVISION bump. I say this with my portmgr hat on. Please bump the PORTREVISION. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkeWOiwACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4ezcwCgmdLizwf9dtegOnO2QZV0rbYV w0EAoKQt18y9yTWbAAyCIv8hgqthhCfH =d4Bq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1201027632.54891.6.camel>