Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 13:15:29 +0800 From: David Xu <yfxu@corp.netease.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Cc: Michael Vince <mv@roq.com>, Sven Petai <hadara@bsd.ee>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Subject: Re: mysql performance on 4 * dualcore opteron Message-ID: <200604081315.29842.yfxu@corp.netease.com> In-Reply-To: <4434DB85.10104@roq.com> References: <200604041942.18767.hadara@bsd.ee> <021b01c658d2$de254a00$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <4434DB85.10104@roq.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ÔÚ Thursday 06 April 2006 17:12£¬Michael Vince дµÀ£º > I have also done benchmarking with libthr against Apache using 'ab' and > found it can deliver an extra amount of megabytes/sec of data (I think > it was about an extra 2000/requests sec) at the cost of giving the > server from what I remember almost double the 'average load' according > to 'top' > Given that if your machine has nothing else to do but deliver data > purely from Apache then even libthr is more worth while for Apache as well. > > Mike libpthread default uses M:N threads which means a thread may be on userland scheduler's run queue, and FreeBSD kernel does not know, so it will be not shown on average load, default system tools are not very useful here. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604081315.29842.yfxu>