Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:17:18 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <16322.51646.766041.349180@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org> References: <20031124.191931.67791612.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031125025621.453732A8FC@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm writes: > We need nsswitch type functionality in /bin/sh. To the people who want to > make it static, lets see some static binary dlopen() support or a nsswitch > proxy system. Maybe this is just nieve, but I always thought that it was the responsibility of the party introducing the creeping feature to underdatand and then minimize a potential performance impact. But now we're treading over ground brought up by John Dyson last week. I've at least partially quantified the performance impact, which is all I have time for. Drew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16322.51646.766041.349180>