Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:33:08 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net Cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reducing the need to compile a custom kernel Message-ID: <4f368a34.rIGc5BVL5Vu8OIjl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <5B8B698D-6DC0-4334-8617-4EDEC7973D9D@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20120210145604.Horde.ewjpSpjmRSRPNSH0YRHxgAk@webmail.leidinger.net> <5B8B698D-6DC0-4334-8617-4EDEC7973D9D@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > various parts of the network stack being loadable, which is not > as easy as it sounds, especially making them unloadable again > currently ... Seems to me unloadability does not matter to the case under discussion, which is modularizing the kernel to reduce the number of cases in which a custom kernel is needed. How much real functional difference is there between "built in" and "loaded permanently at boot"?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4f368a34.rIGc5BVL5Vu8OIjl%perryh>