Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:46:59 +0900 From: Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander@Leidinger.net, Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>, Dario Freni <saturnero@freesbie.org>, ozawa@ongs.co.jp Subject: patchset-10 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) Message-ID: <4433CA53.5050000@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org> References: <E1F5gbI-000Eea-B7@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <43E5D052.3020207@freebsd.org> <43E656C7.8040302@freesbie.org> <43E6D5C8.4050405@freebsd.org> <43E71485.5040901@freesbie.org> <43E73330.8070101@freebsd.org> <43EB4C00.2030101@freebsd.org> <4417DD8D.3050201@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of
the unionfs patchset-10.
Patchset-10:
For 7-current
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p10.diff
For 6.x
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p10.diff
Changes in unionfs-p10.diff
- Fixed a problem that does not unlock a vnode around some
treatments of VOP_RENAME.
- Added workaround implementation for panic by umount(8) -f.
- Changed around VOP_ADVLOCK treatments to make shadow file
into upper layer always to keep lock consistency.
The documents of those unionfs patches:
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ (English)
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese)
Attentions:
We are getting union_getwritemount rewrite work still now.
The p-10 is intermediate step implementation, and some code
in not according to style(9) source code style.
I want to get active unionfs patchset users to test it. If
you want stable implementation, please wait until p-11.
However, of course, p-10 is stable rather than p-9 already :)
Thanks
--
Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4433CA53.5050000>