Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:02:29 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r196818 - head/contrib/ee Message-ID: <20090904150229.GA4007@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20090904145005.GX2829@hoeg.nl> References: <200909040742.n847gD62058267@svn.freebsd.org> <20090904103214.GW2829@hoeg.nl> <20090904140219.GA3179@nagual.pp.ru> <20090904145005.GX2829@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:50:05PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > * Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:32:14PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > > Even though I really appreciate fixes/cleanups to ee(1), I think changes > > > like these should be sent to its maintainer as well. Have you done this? > > > > Yes. > > Great! The reason why I was being a little negative, is because I > noticed the previous version of ee(1) we had, had a lot of local patches > that were very hard to merge. It turned out most of the features were > implemented upstream as well, albeit differently. > > It's nice to see someone step up to hunt down bugs in ee(1). I got no reply from the author yet, lets wait. Ctype stuff there was in pre-POSIX (and even pre-BSD4.3) old times state, but luckily enough it affect only several edge cases in FreeBSD. Most unpleasant bug which was the reason I start to look there was all 8bit chars highlighting due to passing negative chars to waddch(). -- http://ache.pp.ru/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqhLAUACgkQVg5YK5ZEdN2SqgCgqB4OOpyRZjHuAtrF+/Se0Ayy kIcAn3aGNxvnXP30OJ9WkmQvoWXHTxwh =9j2L -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090904150229.GA4007>