Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 06:19:13 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Warren <shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-STABLE failing to read 4.x-Stable hdd Message-ID: <20050108191849.GG39552@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200501081658.10291.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> References: <200501081518.33396.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <200501081628.05881.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> <200501081722.09390.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200501081658.10291.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2005-Jan-08 16:58:10 +1000, Warren wrote: >> I didn't suggest you trash it I just want to know if it was setup as >> dangerously dedicated, and what the output of the fdisk command on both >> drives is.. > >Soz mis understood.. Try running disklabel on ad0s1 and ad1s1. Slice numbers should now be treated as mandatory on sliced disks. -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050108191849.GG39552>