Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:45:13 +0300 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: lev@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re[4]: 6.3-PRERELEASE: interrupt storm detected on "irq11:"; throttling interrupt source, (irq11 is em0) Message-ID: <1963124917.20071115234513@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0711151203t232b515ic48bf9dcdaf57640@mail.gmail.com> References: <44941699.20071115221850@serebryakov.spb.ru> <2a41acea0711151146j497529c9m3299d2e2cc6fcb64@mail.gmail.com> <875809296.20071115225240@serebryakov.spb.ru> <2a41acea0711151203t232b515ic48bf9dcdaf57640@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Jack. You wrote 15 ?????? 2007 ?., 23:03:46: > sysctl hw.intr_storm_threshold If I set this onw to 10000, em0 generate 1001-1002 irq per second (accroding to vmstat -i) without any storm messages :) > In this old of an adapter though seems more likely something is > wrong. Yep... 1002 ips without traffic... It is too much, IMHO :) > Let me see if our test group can dig up this adapter and try it. It was sold as: Intel PWLA 8390-MT Pro/ 1000MT (chip 82540EM) OEM -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1963124917.20071115234513>