Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:01:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <hackers@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Two Junior Kernel Hacker tasks.. Message-ID: <20010622105917.N20923-100000@wonky.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010622110208.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >
> > sys/${MACHINE_ARCH}/compile?
>
> Sure, fine. I don't really care which, I just would like the problem solved
> somehow. :)
I seem to recall that the 2 or 3 times I've brought this up over the last 3-4
years either Bruce or Peter or both said No!, but my memory could be playing
me false.
What *I* do is NFS mount my test source from a common machine, but then nfs
loopback mount the compile directory for each machine. I'd use a nullfs mount
if that worked.
This has the feature of avoiding the multiplatform foo (mostly- it's been
known to break over the last year or so), and also to get more reasonable
compile performance.
-matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010622105917.N20923-100000>