Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 22:47:09 +0100 From: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> To: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Plan for "distribution set" deprecation Message-ID: <aNHD3RXadj1EMUlf@amaryllis.le-fay.org> In-Reply-To: <xtkzcgocu5uwhqqghp27k4wjqu3cl24y4n4jcwms43bj6udm5e@wmnwfbucjpod> References: <fd63e8df-3209-4b83-9dc5-5df4ec690bbf@freebsd.org> <xtkzcgocu5uwhqqghp27k4wjqu3cl24y4n4jcwms43bj6udm5e@wmnwfbucjpod>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Shawn Webb wrote in <xtkzcgocu5uwhqqghp27k4wjqu3cl24y4n4jcwms43bj6udm5e@wmnwfbucjpod>: > Thank you for your (and others!) work on this. I'm hoping that this > bug can be resolved before PKGBASE is enabled by default for release > generation: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=287877 can you please show the full process you're using to build the release image, including any make(1) settings (KERNCONF, etc.)? i am also curious if the patch at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D52638 makes any difference. > I have confirmed that the pkgbase repo that gets built does indeed > include the right kernel package. Hence why I'm puzzled why that lua > assertion is being tripped. please also show the (names of) the kernel packages you have in your release repository, i.e. the one in <objdir>/release/pkgbase-repo which is generated during the release build. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaNHD2gAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YLLfAQDrKaTjXBFkEoUIHl62dOlk95z8x3zI8oFgQ4zLVOiJIQD+Nlj+jJ0dmc47 6tCJn51Gi5E50rVrwmZcAYlZrqx/3AY= =TdJf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aNHD3RXadj1EMUlf>