Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:25:45 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Sam Leffler <sam@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile Message-ID: <434FDC09.1060303@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <20051014161254.GB1337@ip.net.ua> References: <200510141512.j9EFCksd060023@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051014161254.GB1337@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi Sam, > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:12:46PM +0000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >>ru 2005-10-14 15:12:46 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: >> sys/modules Makefile >> Log: >> Sort SUBDIR and surrounding definitions. >> >> Revision Changes Path >> 1.459 +4 -4 src/sys/modules/Makefile >> > > This moves ath_rate_sample after ath_rate_onoe in the SUBDIR > list, making the former end up as /boot/kernel/ath_rate.ko. > I thought it's OK since ath_rate_sample is documented in the > ath(4) manpage, and it appears to work OK, but now I noticed > that ath_rate_onoe is preferred in sys/conf/*/NOTES. So > which one is actually preferred? ath_rate_sample is the desired algorithm. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?434FDC09.1060303>