Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:22:01 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> To: Josef El-Rayes <josef@daemon.li> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <20040113182201.GA48706@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <400409F4.3090205@freebsd.org> <400428DC.2060108@theatre.msu.edu> <20040113181911.GB432@jenny.daemon.li>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:19:11PM +0100, Josef El-Rayes wrote: > "Jonathan T. Sage" <sagejona@theatre.msu.edu> wrote: > > 1. a lot of the commits are going to be ports related, and=20 > > therefore dropped immediatally. this sort of report is handled=20 > > wonderfully by dan @ freshports, i see no reason to duplicate=20 > > what he has done > why excluding ports? i think important changes in the ports area > should be covered here too.=20 As Jonathan said, the freshports is the best site where you can get all issues about it. -Kirill --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABDdJQC1G6a60JuURAv+XAKDVwS9UAflgdJFKfciQkWV6l94LagCglYa/ aWiz8wsNuQ01QH1t1tRcMTA= =pqFq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040113182201.GA48706>