Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:48:05 +0200 (SAT) From: John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za> To: des@ofug.org (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) Cc: kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp (Jun Kuriyama), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The next "make release" breaker... Message-ID: <200210301348.g9UDm5Rc030017@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> In-Reply-To: <xzpadkw2iqa.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> from Dag-Erling Smorgrav at "Oct 30, 2002 01:50:53 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> writes: > > At Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:01:32 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > The *installed* libssh shouldn't matter. What matters is the libssh > > > which is built during 'make world' inside the chroot. That's what > > > sshd should be linked against. > > Sorry for my misunderstanding. You mention > > $chrootdir/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssh/libssh.a, right? > > Yes, that's what I mean. > > > % cd $chrootdir/usr/obj/usr/src/secure/lib/libssh > > % nm libssh.a | grep mm_auth > > 000005e0 T mm_auth2_read_banner > > 000006f0 T mm_auth_password > > 00000820 T mm_auth_rhosts_rsa_key_allowed > > 00001df0 T mm_auth_rsa_generate_challenge > > 00001d00 T mm_auth_rsa_key_allowed > > 00001ef0 T mm_auth_rsa_verify_response > > That's definitely not right :( The part where it is failing is in release.3 of release/Makefile. Following that around libssh should probably be rebuilt with K5, so shouldn't KPROGS in kerberos5/Makefile also have secure/lib/libssh? John -- John Hay -- John.Hay@icomtek.csir.co.za / jhay@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210301348.g9UDm5Rc030017>