Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:59:57 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, Tomas Olsson <tol@stacken.kth.se> Subject: Re: docs/95104: tsleep() man page mentions nonexistent 'mtx' arg Message-ID: <200603300759.58726.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200603301119.k2UBJ85v021791@www.freebsd.org> References: <200603301119.k2UBJ85v021791@www.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 30 March 2006 06:19 am, Tomas Olsson wrote: > >Number: 95104 > >Category: docs > >Synopsis: tsleep() man page mentions nonexistent 'mtx' arg > >Confidential: no > >Severity: non-critical > >Priority: low > >Responsible: freebsd-doc > >State: open > >Quarter: > >Keywords: > >Date-Required: > >Class: doc-bug > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 30 11:20:15 GMT 2006 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Tomas Olsson > >Release: 5.5-BETA4 > >Organization: > > Stacken Computer Club > > >Environment: > > FreeBSD lab04.lab.it.su.se 5.5-BETA4 FreeBSD 5.5-BETA4 #0: Mon Mar 13 > 23:12:57 UTC 2006 =20 > root@perseus.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > >Description: > > SLEEP(9) says under tsleep(): > If the Giant lock is not held and mtx is NULL, then timo must be > non-zero. However, the given proto is > int > tsleep(void *ident, int priority, const char *wmesg, int timo); > -- no mtx there. Is this just plain wrong, or should it be under msleep() > instead? Under msleep instead. Really, msleep() is the general call now, tsleep() is just a special case that hardcodes the mtx argument as NULL. Thus, the manpage should probably describe msleep() as the primary function and then describe tsleep() as an msleep() without a mtx arg. =2D-=20 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> =A0<>< =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" =A0=3D =A0http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603300759.58726.jhb>