Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 09:12:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Didier Derny <didier@omnix.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <dag-erli@ifi.uio.no>, zenin@archive.rhps.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980821090942.1284A-100000@omnix.net> In-Reply-To: <199808202142.OAA26941@usr04.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Aug 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > is too good to be true. Blame it on differences in configuration. > > This is the "Yard" thing, where 100 byte packets fly in FreeBSD > when TCP_NODELAY is set on the server. > > The thing that is killing Linux is their delayed ack implementation. > > > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org By the way, do you know how the delayed ack is implemented in Linux ? do yo think that there is the same problem with linux but handled differently ? -- Didier Derny didier@omnix.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980821090942.1284A-100000>