Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:50:43 +0300
From:      Gleb Kurtsou <gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com>
To:        Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT
Message-ID:  <20110927185043.GA84488@tops>
In-Reply-To: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com>
References:  <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (26/09/2011 23:03), Ade Lovett wrote:
> With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
> expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
> 
> The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completely
> at random) assuming that FreeBSD would never jump to a double-digit
> major version number, and as such, various regexps for "freebsd1*" (ie:
> FreeBSD 1.1.x) are now matching "freebsd10".

It's more exciting than that. FreeBSD >= 10 is already seized by
Apple :)

http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/&q=__FreeBSD__%5CW%2B10&type=cs


> 
> This is going to be some fairly fundamental breakage.
> 
> However, until such time as 9.0-RELEASE is completely out of the door,
> with autotools hat on, I will _not_ be committing any changes to
> infrastructural ports to "fix" this.
> 
> That is to say, until 9.0-R happens, and for some considerable period
> afterwards, ya'll can pretty much expect ports/ to be non-functional on
> HEAD.  PRs mentioning this will be gleefully closed referencing this
> message.
> 
> -aDe
> 
> Reply-To set to me.  Please honor it.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110927185043.GA84488>