Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "R. B. Riddick" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
To:        "Szabó" "Péter" <matyee@mail.alba.hu>, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: raid3 is slow
Message-ID:  <299130.71872.qm@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <009601c7713f$6b9f2a60$6502a8c0@peteruj>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric wrote:
>>>         inside:        102400 kbytes in   3.416896 sec =    29969
kbytes/sec
>>>
>> Looks slow...
>
> You think so?  I think that's pretty acceptable for a UDMA100 device.
>
Yup... I thought, it was 2MB/sec... Dont know why... 29-55 is good...

--- Szabó Péter <matyee@mail.alba.hu> wrote:

> > And what if u try this:
> > dd if=/dev/raid3/... of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128
> > ?
> 
> #dd if=/dev/raid3/nmivol of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128
> 128+0 records in
> 128+0 records out
> 134217728 bytes transferred in 1.555843 secs (86266891 bytes/sec)
>
OK

> > 8KB/transfer is a little low for my taste... Looks like ur copy program 
> > uses
> > 32KB transfers, instead of 128KB transfers...
> 
> > What if u try
> > dd if=/source-file/on/raid3-device of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128
> > ?
> 
> dd if=/mnt/vol/site/video/Sissi_2-3/SISSI_2.ISO of=/dev/null bs=1m count=128
> 128+0 records in
> 128+0 records out
> 134217728 bytes transferred in 6.096775 secs (22014545 bytes/sec)
> 
Hmm...
It is still quite slow (the raw device can do about 80MB/sec)...
Is it better than with mc?
How was CPU-usage / system-load?

-Arne


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?299130.71872.qm>