Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 10:31:15 +0200 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions Message-ID: <52035753.1080006@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1umgY8E6736vzARoFbKaWTk71Lun3t6GO6DWp_mBQ1tsw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-FndCQ0YEo9_6x3g-12XEs8QmtyecwkLBX9z_sptnOUNTHrw@mail.gmail.com> <20120829060158.GA38721@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAaFv2o05MZZceT8Qr4mhPxuzrnmOZ30c3gy8=pnjjZvw@mail.gmail.com> <20120831052003.GA91340@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAaxQA8NYCFSN629XXi9zMVNyu2TuHjZLvmn3jhzRJb4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDdDVuwc=NgDeG7XiWW59-%2BLs5wc2GBqbjLOLDUdUb9SA@mail.gmail.com> <20120905201531.GA54452@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndCHSroZFfVgHAW8SUVZhDSaX9qix=aZnHVC_BN_fW6sgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndDr5WmeKXCwSCucQ4w3hPHRBuu36YH1xiW_wKXOkKEdZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndCvc%2BphY_g4CeGfzsj017roxs_C5adjuLuszpEPWO2%2B1g@mail.gmail.com> <20120917140055.GA9037@x2.osted.lan> <CAJ-FndAP9Ua6tRcbrfYY1%2B56O-YbJvmyaUco9K42-0hmchKD6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndAisKoCwLkvXpmW=XhXDRH8me8fMjwrfBuWVqfoA95rmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-FndBM1wSviT_KhPA3SYvR6kENYn0vU6TpWP3D3futD0PPkQ@mail.gmail.com> <52028C31.6060908@omnilan.de> <CAN6yY1umgY8E6736vzARoFbKaWTk71Lun3t6GO6DWp_mBQ1tsw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBADF1F97E6A532456356F403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bez=C3=BCglich Kevin Oberman's Nachricht vom 08.08.2013 01:11 (localtime= ): > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < > h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > >> Bez=C3=BCglich Attilio Rao's Nachricht vom 14.10.2012 02:27 (localtim= e): >>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> >> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> >> wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>= >> wrote: >>>>>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>: >>>>>>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>: >>>>>>>> As already published several times, according to the following p= lan: >>>>>>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I still haven't heard from Vivien or Edward, anyway as NTFS is >>>>>>> basically only used RO these days (also the mount_ntfs code just >>>>>>> permits RO mounting) I stripped all the uncomplete/bogus write >> support >>>>>>> with the following patch: >>>>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/ntfs_remove_write.patch >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is an attempt to make the code smaller and possibly just foc= us >> on >> >> ... >> >>> I've committed the FUSE support into base as r241519. >> Thank you for your great work! >> I had used >> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_stable9_241030.patch >> with releng/9.1. >> Some improovements were made in the meantime in head. >> I'm not familiar with svn. >> Was it possible to generate a new patchset against releng/9.2? I'd hav= e >> to concat manually downloadad revisions via svnweb... :-( >> >> Thanks a lot, >> >> -Harry >> >> Already done. All of the changes in head have been back-ported to > 9.2-PRERELEASE with the exception of a locking enhancement not availabl= e > outside of current. You can find it at: > https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B9QNUQlebx5UdlhPUTB4TXF6enc/edit?usp=3D= sharing Great, I found accidentally the download-arrow for fuse_stable9_253631.patch after enabling java script - not used to google interfaces... (for those who want to get the patch with fetch/wget/...:=20 ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/local-patches/RELEN= G_9_2/no_autoapply/fuse_stable9_253631.patch.orig ) There's still only GENERIC for amd64 altered to include fuse by default. Any reason why not i386? I'd not include it in any GENERIC kernel, I'd prefer keeping it loadable... Just for interest, is there a one-liner to get such a patchset out of svn? Looks like the above was done with local sourcetree, not svn internally? Best regards, -Harry --------------enigBADF1F97E6A532456356F403 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlIDV1MACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8gK1QCgnPmClsA2n5SLya5XgNClLYMJ NJcAn0WvKgg2vngB9UFz8KOwYB4fI//h =uKE3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBADF1F97E6A532456356F403--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52035753.1080006>