Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:10:38 -0500 From: David Sze <dsze@distrust.net> To: JM <jmartin37@speakeasy.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux Message-ID: <20050617161038.GC94284@mail.distrust.net> In-Reply-To: <42B2F4E2.4000507@speakeasy.net> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050617103807.058c6fa8@mail.distrust.net> <005c01c57354$3e877900$fe00a8c0@uzi> <42B2E9B5.7090803@goldsword.com> <42B2EC18.3030407@speakeasy.net> <20050617154149.GA94284@mail.distrust.net> <42B2F4E2.4000507@speakeasy.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:05:54PM -0400, JM wrote: > David Sze wrote: > > > >Under normal circumstances I'd agree, but -CURRENT is already in code > >freeze in preparation for the upcoming 6.0 release: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html > > > >I also follow the cvs-src mailing list pretty closely, and I like the > >stability and performance increases that have gone into there. It seems > >like most of them won't be backported to RELENG_5 because they break ABI > >compatibility. > > > > > > > > > code freeze != glitch free XD RELENG_5_X, RELENG_5, RELENG_4_X, RELENG_4 != glitch free Point being, in both cases the key is to follow the mailing lists, not make decisions on what to use based solely on the way they're labelled.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050617161038.GC94284>