Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:10:38 -0500 From: David Sze <dsze@distrust.net> To: JM <jmartin37@speakeasy.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD MySQL still WAY slower than Linux Message-ID: <20050617161038.GC94284@mail.distrust.net> In-Reply-To: <42B2F4E2.4000507@speakeasy.net> References: <6.2.1.2.2.20050617103807.058c6fa8@mail.distrust.net> <005c01c57354$3e877900$fe00a8c0@uzi> <42B2E9B5.7090803@goldsword.com> <42B2EC18.3030407@speakeasy.net> <20050617154149.GA94284@mail.distrust.net> <42B2F4E2.4000507@speakeasy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:05:54PM -0400, JM wrote: > David Sze wrote: > > > >Under normal circumstances I'd agree, but -CURRENT is already in code > >freeze in preparation for the upcoming 6.0 release: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/schedule.html > > > >I also follow the cvs-src mailing list pretty closely, and I like the > >stability and performance increases that have gone into there. It seems > >like most of them won't be backported to RELENG_5 because they break ABI > >compatibility. > > > > > > > > > code freeze != glitch free XD RELENG_5_X, RELENG_5, RELENG_4_X, RELENG_4 != glitch free Point being, in both cases the key is to follow the mailing lists, not make decisions on what to use based solely on the way they're labelled.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050617161038.GC94284>