Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:28:37 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> Cc: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Unify printing the function name in panic messages() Message-ID: <86bobphoe2.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <5118BEC9.1090708@gmx.de> (Christoph Mallon's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:50:01 %2B0100") References: <51141E33.4080103@gmx.de> <511426B8.2070800@FreeBSD.org> <51160E06.1070404@gmx.de> <20130209195417.C1753@besplex.bde.org> <51161C10.9070002@gmx.de> <5116504A.7010409@mu.org> <5118BEC9.1090708@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de> writes: > Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> writes: > > Would we just turn panic() into a macro instead of making PANIC() > > everywhere in the kernel? Too many uppercase macros are hard on the > > eyes. > This is a good point. I will adjust the patches accordingly. Please don't. Macros need to be easily recognizable as such, since macro parameters are evaluated differently from function parameters. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bobphoe2.fsf>