Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 20:40:54 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: qcwap <1051244836@qq.com>, freebsd-wireless <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Correct net80211 channel flag. Message-ID: <1CD45BDA-FA62-4010-AE71-60AAF7B3E8F1@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=Jt4HbAzo-9TKKSiesdtx9touoxGY_qgwrLUUi%2BDJa0Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <tencent_2D16BB0B925A1EA4B4BAD2454A8C4F503F06@qq.com> <CAJ-Vmon8yS5D0Q6QdCNLC9VWoKG_tuP_HLrLGzNJjhNWhXLXNA@mail.gmail.com> <tencent_89C560047561F9B8CCA8254232A98F5EC40A@qq.com> <CAJ-VmomNCC_cvF249Xbznh4nqbranvduNqdEUkViZdLoD_aoFg@mail.gmail.com> <tencent_2E840B9C9A04A4B8FAC58571CC49903F9606@qq.com> <CAJ-Vmo=Jt4HbAzo-9TKKSiesdtx9touoxGY_qgwrLUUi%2BDJa0Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2 Apr 2021, at 6:44, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I've got this in my local tree now. That’s not a good idea? > I have a note to go dig up which > draft I yanked this from and update it with reference to the draft and > the current spec. > > Thanks for pointing this out! Aehm, am I missing something but I believe everywhere we use these values we do properly apply a maskshift apart from ieee80211_vht_get_vhtcap_ie() where we apply a shiftmask when setting them again after doing the logic checks so changing them will do us no good at all or am I looking at the wrong tree? /bz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1CD45BDA-FA62-4010-AE71-60AAF7B3E8F1>