Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 31 Jan 2002 03:44:45 -0800 (PST)
From:      <roam@FreeBSD.org>
To:        timon@memphis.mephi.ru, roam@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: bin/34483: wrong execv() call in amd for ${mount} and ${unmount} if mount type:=program in amd.map
Message-ID:  <200201311144.g0VBijd93137@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Synopsis: wrong execv() call in amd for ${mount} and ${unmount} if mount type:=program in amd.map

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: roam
State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 31 03:35:28 PST 2002
State-Changed-Why: 
amd is contributed software, as witnessed by the sources' location
in the contrib/ section of the FreeBSD source tree.  As per the FreeBSD
policy regarding contributed software, and as per the specific instructions
in the src/contrib/amd/FREEBSD-upgrade file, local changes should be kept
down to a minumum, and all proposed changes should be sent to the amd
maintainers at <amd-dev@majordomo.cs.columbia.edu> for inclusion
in a future release.  Thus, the changes would be cleanly imported into FreeBSD
at the import of the next release, and there would be no conflicts
in future imports.

Could you verify if the change you are proposing (which looks fine to me
personally, and therefore should also look fine to the amd maintainers)
would not be accepted by the amd developers, so it can be cleanly imported
into FreeBSD?  If it is, and if it is accepted exactly as in your patch,
it would even be possible to commit it to FreeBSD before the next import,
as it will be cleanly "swallowed" at import time.

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=34483

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201311144.g0VBijd93137>