Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:28:52 +0000 From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Re; svn commit: r352393 - head/sys/fs/nfsclient Message-ID: <YTXPR0101MB2189EE93CBE934C637446263DD8C0@YTXPR0101MB2189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> In-Reply-To: <YTXPR0101MB21890232925E49EDEAF10772DD8C0@YTXPR0101MB2189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> References: <YTXPR0101MB21890232925E49EDEAF10772DD8C0@YTXPR0101MB2189.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Resent to correct address... ________________________________________ From: Rick Macklem Sent: Monday, September 16, 2019 11:27 AM To: kib@freebsd.org; peterj@freebsd.org Cc: src-svn-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re; svn commit: r352393 - head/sys/fs/nfsclient Hi Kostik, I'm afraid there was a reason that only certain cases (where the file was being shrunk) did the vnode_pager_setsize() call after the NFS node lock is released. See the commit log message for r252528. If vnode_pager_setsize() now acquires a sleep lock for the case where the size is increasing, it sounds like the NFS node lock will have to become a sleep lock instead of a mutex. (If needed, I can get working on this in a day or two.) rick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YTXPR0101MB2189EE93CBE934C637446263DD8C0>