Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 10:59:56 -0400 From: Keith Stevenson <k.stevenson@louisville.edu> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. Message-ID: <19990626105956.A11193@homer.louisville.edu> In-Reply-To: <48541.930372953@axl.noc.iafrica.com>; from Sheldon Hearn on Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 06:55:53AM %2B0200 References: <199906252002.NAA31761@sigma.veritas.com> <48541.930372953@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 06:55:53AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > I don't think the core team would care enough about something this silly > to bother making a decision, so I'm just watching what people have to > say. I'm leaning toward leaving the "nowrap" feature out. FWIW, I think that leaving out the nowrap feature would be a very good idea. I'm willing to agree (somewhat grudgingly) that incorporating libwrap is a definite feature improvement, but this conf file change doesn't seem to buy much at all. If a user needs that level of granularity, they can disable libwrap support on the inetd command line and use tcpd. Regards, --Keith Stevenson-- -- Keith Stevenson System Programmer - Data Center Services - University of Louisville k.stevenson@louisville.edu PGP key fingerprint = 4B 29 A8 95 A8 82 EA A2 29 CE 68 DE FC EE B6 A0 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990626105956.A11193>