Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:06:57 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Major CAM performance regression Message-ID: <200902172307.n1HN74ml025580@pyroxene.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org> References: <499551B9.7050805@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 05:55 AM 2/13/2009, Scott Long wrote:
>If, instead, it reports a value of '1', you are likely affected. Note
>that it may be normal for USB memory devices to report a low number.
>Also, many legacy SCSI disks, and devices that are not disks, may
>also be expected to report a low number.
Hi Scott,
I tested with the patch on my areca controller, and it still
reports 1 post patch. (On RELENG_6, it shows 255 with the same controller)
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200902172307.n1HN74ml025580>