Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 09:15:13 -0700 From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/de_DE.ISO8859-1/share/sgml release.dsl src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/share/sgml release.dsl src/release/doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/share/sgml release.dsl src/release/doc/ja_JP.eucJP/share/sgml release.dsl Message-ID: <200208301615.g7UGFDG0058826@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20020830080036.GA193@marduk.blackend.org> References: <200208282126.g7SLQXQt095149@freefall.freebsd.org> <200208291841.g7TIf0KA048036@intruder.bmah.org> <20020830080036.GA193@marduk.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] If memory serves me right, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > Yes, I just "unbroke" the release notes. You added exactly what I was > thinking about, and the code is quite similar to the one in the other > .dsl files which gives more consistency. I cut-and-pasted. :-) > I will add more vendor attributes today in the man-ref.ent Cool...thanks. > I talked with Giorgos about all these attributes, and maybe I will split > the man-ref.ent file in dedicaced files: base, xfree, ports, etc., and > at this time we could start to use &man.xfree86.xterm.1; scheme as > talked in a previous thread with Nik. But for that, I will wait for the > release of the 4.7. If you do this, is it possible to have the documents continue to include just a single man-refs.ent file (which would itself include the dedicated *.ent files)? Saves us having to go back and patch every single document. > Maybe you will have, one day, to use manual page from -CURRENT and > -STABLE at the same time in the release notes, so we have to think about > it too. Urk, I sure hope not...this sounds messy! > > Once that's done, I need to MFC all the stylesheets to RELENG_4 so I can > > build 4-STABLE's release notes correctly. I'm about at that stage now. I also need to merge this back to RELNOTESng on the new 5_dp2 Perforce branch. > > Before I get there, however, could you tell me why you are using XFree86 > > 4.0.2's manpages, instead of XFree86 4.2.0? > > > > Hmm you're right, I assume it comes from the time when Nik wrote that code, > XFree86 4.0.2 and NetBSD 1.5 were *current* :) > I will correct it, today. Oh, foo. I got the XFree86 version right, but I'll need to update NetBSD. We'll converge eventually, right? :-) Thanks, Bruce. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9b5oR2MoxcVugUsMRAjshAJ9pdjghA6sUiB4Z7Q1YgCZ9JmTCbACgu0Kb vCwaHauJZ2fjMWWnP/tn3gs= =il4G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208301615.g7UGFDG0058826>