Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:30:08 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Message-ID: <200003302330.PAA52353@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/12722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Date: 30 Mar 2000 15:19:52 -0800 * It was me, who was not clear :) No, this time, FreeBSD is the licensee, * who builds the binary out of AT&T's source code and distributes the said * binary. The licensee is not required to present the license to its * users. That's the piece of information I was missing. Thanks. By the way, does that mean that *I* have to read the license every time I build it? (But I don't read all the logs!) * happening. The tarball consists of only 4 files: * * ATTLICENSE ReadMe RunMe RunMe.asc * * To get the source, one needs to run RunMe, which asks to accept a * license. Which is why this is in the post-extract target. Upon * acceptance, it extracts the source code from itself and removes itself. Wow. Very clever indeed. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003302330.PAA52353>