Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 21:01:18 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture Message-ID: <944760435.20130401210118@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304011802360.97433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr%2BJVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304011802360.97433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hello, Wojciech. You wrote 1 апреля 2013 г., 20:03:27: >> that it is NOT necessary to make it a first class branch . 1 Giga Bytes , >> and even 2 Giga Bytes memory chips are disappearing from the computer shops >> slowly . WP> at now 2GB RAM is smallest you can get, and intel atom is lowest end - but WP> still 64-bit - CPU. It is not exact so. Some Atoms on some motherboards with some firmwares are 64-bit CPU. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?944760435.20130401210118>