Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 16:17:33 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Jochen Neumeister <joneum@bsdproject.de> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Problem with WITH_LLD_IS_LD Message-ID: <CAPyFy2Bi8piLkD6wgW-EgQ_=RpxnQNYBfhfJvdYW_yZjaHrpzg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <88be867e-f343-fde8-b30f-688d7317a56d@bsdproject.de> References: <88be867e-f343-fde8-b30f-688d7317a56d@bsdproject.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 3 March 2017 at 12:24, Jochen Neumeister <joneum@bsdproject.de> wrote: > Hi current@ > > I have a PR 217519 because of devel/pear: When WITH_LLD_IS_LD is set, the > stage phase for devel/pear breaks. Yes, there are issues building a number of ports with LLD at present. There are some hacks / work in progress in both LLD and the Ports tree to make things work. The most common issue right now is that libtool looks at the output of the linker's --version string and assumes that only linkers containing the string "GNU" accept certain command-line options. Rafael Espíndola's experimental Poudriere runs have a hack to have LLD include something like "not GNU" as a workaround. WIP changes on the ports side can be found in my ports tree clone on GitHub: https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/tree/ports-lld At this point WITH_LLD_IS_LD works for the base system but is very much experimental for building ports.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2Bi8piLkD6wgW-EgQ_=RpxnQNYBfhfJvdYW_yZjaHrpzg>